My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005 - 06-20-05 Regular Meeting
public access
>
Clerk
>
MINUTES
>
2005
>
2005 - 06-20-05 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2009 2:36:08 PM
Creation date
1/16/2009 3:02:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Admin-Clerk
Document Type
Minutes
Committee
Board of Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Saretha Copelin from Works for Christ Christian Center was scheduled to <br />appear before the Board but was not present. <br />Staff from the North Carolina Department of Revenue presented a report <br />concerning a recent study of the Lee County Tax Office. Mr. Michael Brown and Mr. <br />Kirk Boone answered questions from Board members concerning the report. <br />The Board considered a request from Tobacco Road Golf Course concerning a <br />beer license. A letter from Tobacco Road Golf Course was received in the Manager's <br />Office on May 25, 2005, stating they had been notified in May by the Lee County Tax <br />Office that they had never applied for a beer license to sell beer at the golf course <br />clubhouse, alone with a statement in the amount of $481.25 to cover 1999-2005 license <br />fees. It was stated in the letter that this was the first time they had been notified of any <br />type beer license required. Tobacco Road Golf Course was asking that the Board waive <br />all prior year license fees and related penalties. Tax Administrator Kep Kepley <br />recommended the request be denied because of failure to purchase the required license as <br />directed by State statute. Commissioner Adams moved to accept the recommendation of <br />the Tax Administrator to deny the request. Upon a vote, the results were as follows: <br />Aye: Adams, Brown, Hincks, Lemmond, Reives, and Stevens <br />Nay: None <br />Absent: Paschal <br />The Chairman ruled the motion had been adopted unanimously. <br />The Board considered a request from Tax Administrator Kep Kepley to approve a <br />resolution directing the Lee County Tax Collector to proceed against the personal <br />property of Carolina Apartment Products, Inc. Mr. Kepley told the Board that Carolina <br />Apartment Products, 1826 Boone Trail Road, Sanford, NC, is in financial problems and <br />owes Lee County $17,937.89 for business personal property. Mr. Kepley visited the <br />business to attach the business personal property and was informed by the owner that <br />RBC Centura had taken over the assets several months ago. It is hoped that RBC will <br />pay the lien but Mr. Kepley was asking the Board to give him authorization to attach the <br />assets of Carolina Apartment Products if RBC Centura does not pay the lien. Mr. Kepley <br />stated that RBC Centura, Guilford County, and the Federal Government are all waiting to <br />attach assets. County Attorney K. R. Hoyle reported to the Board that Ms. Lisa P. <br />Sumner of the Raleigh office of the firm Poyner and Spruill stated that her firm <br />represents RBC Centura Bank which has a perfected lien on the personal property of <br />Carolina Apartment Products. Inc., the tax payer. Ms. Sunnier says that the bank was in <br />possession of the personal property and was selling it in a commercial reasonable manner <br />and the proceeds were being applied on the tax payer's debt to the bank. Ms. Sumner <br />stated that her client was willing to place $30,371.56 of the net funds solely recovered in <br />this fashion in a trust account if the County would forgo making the levy upon the <br />personal property at this time. Mr. Hoyle stated the County and the bank could enter into <br />a written agreement to that affect and then negotiate regarding the issues between them, <br />namely the proper amount of the tax claim and the relative priority of the liens or claims <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.