Laserfiche WebLink
0 0 <br />BOOK 21 M-E 158 <br />Aye: Adams, Brown, Hincks, Lemmond, Paschal, Reives, and Stevens <br />Nay: None <br />The Chairman ruled the motion had been adopted unanimously. <br />County Manager David Smitherman discussed with the Board the State <br />Legislative Agenda. Mr. Smitherman told the Board the Legislative Liaison <br />Committee, made up of Commissioners' Brown and Stevens, himself, and <br />Strategic Initiatives Director Lesa Price, have been working on legislative issues <br />to present to the NCACC for the 2007-08 legislative session. Mr. Smitherman <br />asked the Board to ratify the State Legislative Agenda that has been submitted, a <br />copy of which is attached to these minutes and by this reference made a part <br />hereof. Mr. Smitherman also asked the Board to include, as part of that agenda, <br />a 1% Land Transfer Tax as a revenue option for all one-hundred counties, and <br />Food and Lodging Fees to empower local governments to enact and collect fees <br />for providing Food and Lodging support and inspections. After some discussion, <br />Commissioner Stevens moved to approve the addition of the 1% Land Transfer <br />Tax as a revenue option for all one hundred counties. Upon a vote, the results <br />were as follows: <br />Aye: Brown, Hincks, Lemmond, Paschal, Reives, and Stevens <br />Nay: Adams <br />The Chairman ruled the motion had been adopted by a six to one vote. <br />Commissioner Adams moved to approve the Food and Lodging Fees that would <br />empower local governments to enact and collect fees for providing Food and <br />Lodging support and inspections. Upon a vote, the results were as follows: <br />Aye: Adams, Brown, Hincks, Lemmond, Paschal, Reives, and Stevens <br />Nay: None <br />The Chairman ruled the motion had been adopted unanimously. <br />The Board considered the Sign Ordinance as it relates to the Unified <br />Development Ordinance (UDO). Commissioner Adams questioned why there is <br />a need for political signage limitations/rules/guidelines. He stated he felt the sign <br />ordinance has gone too far. Discussion was based on a political sign that was <br />placed on Commissioner Adams's personal property, which is within the Extra <br />Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). Mr. Adams further stated people should have the <br />right to have signs on their personal property. When the LIDO was adopted in <br />2005 restrictions and regulations in the ETJ were never discussed. Mr. Adams <br />continued to state he felt the section pertaining to political signs should be <br />eliminated from the LIDO and should only be addressed in the corporate limits of <br />the City of Sanford and the Town of Broadway. After further discussion, <br />Chairman Hincks moved that political signs be limited to a maximum sign area of <br />6 <br />