My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006 - 05-15-06 Regular Meeting
public access
>
Clerk
>
MINUTES
>
2006
>
2006 - 05-15-06 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2009 3:02:02 PM
Creation date
1/16/2009 11:18:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Admin-Clerk
Document Type
Minutes
Committee
Board of Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 BOOK ~40 FIGE 956 <br />included in the proposed FY 2006-07 budget. Community Development Director Bob <br />Bridwell outlined the following options (levels of service) that could be considered: <br />• Limited On-Call. Responding to limited complaints on minimum housing <br />violations, junk and abandoned cars, zoning violations, etc. at $40 per <br />hour with no more than a dozen complaints per year. <br />• General. Normal and customary enforcement of minimum housing, <br />nuisance abatement, proactive zoning enforcement, and general <br />complaint response at $50,000 per year. <br />• Comprehensive Enforcement. Aggressively addressing minimum <br />housing standards on an individual and neighborhood level, attacking <br />junk car and nuisance abatement directed toward neighborhood and <br />community rehabilitation, aggressive zoning violation enforcement on a <br />level on par with city code enforcement. Estimated cost of this level of <br />service would be 28 percent of the division, or equal to $107,821 of the <br />current operating budget. <br />After some discussion, it was decided this matter would be discussed in more detail at <br />the next budget work session. No action was taken. <br />The Board considered the FY 2005 Scattered Site CDBG Project. Community <br />Development Director Bob Bridwell and Planner Karen Kennedy addressed the FY <br />2005 CDBG Project and presented options for Lee County to consider in order to begin <br />the project. Mr. Bridwell asked that the County finalize the 2002 Project, continue with <br />the 2005 Project, and request a time extension for the closeout deadline which will <br />consist of the following: <br />• Letter to Division of Community Assistance (DCA) to request time <br />extension for release of funds; <br />• Letter to Division of Community Assistance (DCA) to request time <br />extension of the closeout deadline of December 20, 2007; <br />• Submit additional paperwork for release of funds; <br />• Proceed with project rehabilitation activities; and <br />• Meet new closeout deadline granted by DCA <br />After some discussion, Chairman Hincks moved to approve the above option presented <br />by Mr. Bridwell and Ms. Kenney to proceed with the FY 2005 CDBG Project. Upon a <br />vote, the results were as follows: <br />Aye: Adams, Brown, Hincks, Lemmond, Paschal, Reives, and Stevens <br />Nay: None <br />The Chairman ruled the motion had been adopted unanimously. <br />The Board discussed various matters relating to the FY 2002 CDBG Project and <br />concerns they have with outstanding issues. No action was taken. <br />Parks and Recreation Director John Payne told the Board that Lee County had <br />received a $500,000 grant from the N.C. Parks and Recreation Trust Fund to continue <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.