Laserfiche WebLink
0 0 <br />BOOK 21 PAGE $$5 <br />attendance. Commissioners Nathan E. Paschal, Robert T. Reives, and Linda A. Shook had been <br />excused. <br />Chairman Brown noted that a quorum was present and called the meeting to order and <br />declared the meeting open for the transaction of business. <br />Chairman Brown presided and the following business was transacted: <br />The Chairman announced the purpose of the meeting was to hold a public hearing on <br />seven (7) proposed amendments to the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO). Assistant <br />Director of Community Development Marshall Downey gave a brief description of each of the <br />following amendments: <br />Amendment 1: Table 4.7-1 - add language to clarify that handicap ramps or other <br />similar structures built in order to meet ADA compliance are exempt from setbacks. <br />Amendment 2: Sect. 5.1.3 - add language that clarifies that any accessory <br />structure (deck, etc.) located within eighteen inches (18") of a principal structure shall be required <br />to meet the principal structure setbacks. <br />Amendment 3: Sec. 5.33 - add new third party consultant language for new cell <br />tower SUP applications. <br />Amendment 4: Sec. 5.33 - add language about fall zone and update setback <br />language for lattice towers. <br />Amendment 5: Sec. 5.34 - Temporary Uses (retail) temporary use permits - <br />rewrite entire section to improve language and consolidate; more stringent time limits on retail <br />recommended. <br />Amendment 6: Sec. 11.10 Temporary Banners - rewrite section to change <br />"banners" to "signs" to cover all types of temporary sign materials. Essentially, this is simply a <br />name change to remove and replace the term banner with the term sign. <br />Amendment 7: Sec. 12.5.2.1 Repair and Renovation of nonconformities - <br />Revise language to refer to nonconforming structures and eliminate references to nonconforming <br />uses. Nonconforming uses are addressed under Section 12.4. <br />During Mr. Marshall's summary the Commissioners requested that Amendment No. 3 be <br />revised to reflect that the County would select a consultant rather than retain one and the <br />applicant would have to pay the fee for the consultant's services. This amendment will require <br />that Special Use Permit Applications for new telecommunication towers will be reviewed by an <br />expert third-party consultant. <br />No one present spoke for or against the proposed amendments. After a reasonable <br />period of time, Chairman Brown closed the public hearing. <br />There being no further business to come before the Board, Commissioner Lemmond <br />moved the meeting be adjourned. Upon a vote, that was unanimously adopted, the meeting <br />adjourned in keeping with the motion. <br />Robert H. Brown, Chairman <br />Lee County Board of Commissioners <br />6 <br />