My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007 - 10-15-07 Regular Meeting
public access
>
Clerk
>
MINUTES
>
2007
>
2007 - 10-15-07 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2009 3:37:10 PM
Creation date
1/15/2009 4:24:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Admin-Clerk
Document Type
Minutes
Committee
Board of Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 21 PAGE 852 <br />much time working behind the scenes to assist with building and improving roads in Lee County. <br />The Executive Committee feels that Mr. Keller is very deserving of this honor. The City of Sanford <br />will also be considering a similar resolution at their October 16, 2007 meeting. If approved, the <br />resolution will be forwarded to the Department of Transportation for consideration. After some <br />discussion, Commissioner Reives moved to approve a Resolution Requesting the Board of <br />Transportation Name A Portion of the 421 By-Pass From US 1 to NC 42 In Honor of Oscar A. <br />Keller, Jr., a copy of which is attached to these minutes and by this reference made a part hereof. <br />After some discussion, Commissioner Shook moved to table the matter and let the public have <br />more input into the naming of the by-pass. Upon a vote of the tabled motion, the results were as <br />follows: <br />Aye: Paschal, Shook, and Smith <br />Nay: Brown, Kelly, Lemmond, and Reives <br />The Chairman ruled the motion had been defeated by a four to three vote. <br />Upon a vote of the original motion to approve the resolution, the results were as follows: <br />Aye: Brown, Kelly, Lemmond, Paschal, and Reives <br />Nay: Shook and Smith <br />The Chairman ruled the motion had been adopted by a five to two vote. <br />The Board considered a tax appeal request from Patel Partnerships, Inc. (d/b/a Days Inn <br />and Econo Lodge). Ms. Janet Smith, Attorney from Robbins May & Rich LLP spoke on behalf of <br />Mr. Dipak Patel who owns the two above referenced hotels which are located in Sanford. <br />Approximately $42,000.00 is owned in penalties for failure to file and pay a 3% occupancy tax for <br />rentals at his businesses in February, March, May, July, August and December 2006. Ms. Smith <br />stated Mr. Patel's failure to pay was the result of a clerical error by a new employee. According to <br />law, revenue resulting from fines and forfeitures go to the local Board of Education. School Board <br />Attorney Jimmy Love, Sr., objected to any relief being given to Mr. Patel "on basis of fact." After <br />some discussion, Commissioner Reives moved to deny Mr. Patel's request to waive <br />approximately $42,000.00 in penalties for failure to file and pay occupancy tax during 2006. Upon <br />a vote, the results were as follows: <br />Aye: Brown, Kelly, Lemmond, Paschal, Reives, Shook, and Smith <br />Nay: None <br />The Chairman ruled the motion had been adopted unanimously. <br />Commissioner Reives discussed FY 2005 Community Development Block Grant funds. <br />On August 13, 2007, the Finance Committee tabled a request from the Community Development <br />Office until a written request was received asking that the Department of Community Assistance <br />be notified that Lee County would not be participating in the FY 2005 Community Development <br />Block Grant funding cycle. Community Development staff felt that due to problems encountered <br />with the FY 2002 project, the County has not been able to access the FY 2005 funds. While the <br />problems have been resolved with the 2002 project, the project cannot be closed until a financial <br />statement for the year ending June 30, 2007 is received by the State, which will not be available <br />until November. Funding for the 2005 cycle must be spent by December 31, 2007. Based on the <br />timing for the closeout of the 2002 project, it does not appear the 2005 funds could be spent prior <br />to December 31st, therefore, staff had asked a letter be sent to Division of Community Assistance <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.