Laserfiche WebLink
61.1 <br />suggestions for the Lee County Policy at the first meeting in January 2013. Discussion followed but no <br />action was taken. <br />The Board discussed Commissioner's Financial Policy changes. Commissioner Womack <br />discussed the need to update the 2007 group of Financial Policies. The current version of financial <br />policies dates back to May 2007. At that time, Commissioner Reives and the Finance Committee put <br />together a set of financial policies addressing debt, fees and charges, fund balance, competitive <br />employment, and tax rates. At least two of the policies require updates — (1) Policy Debt and Debt <br />Service; and (2 the Policy addressing ad valorem tax rates not changing exce during revaluation <br />years. Commissioner Womack stated these policies should be reviewed and side red each year <br />and updated as appropriate and he hoped for a consensus on the changes a the January 7 th <br />meeting. Discussion followed but no action was taken. <br />The Board discussed FY 2013 -14 Budget Planning Guidance. Commissio omack <br />discussed the need to provide the County Manager with early p g guidance that h can use in <br />developing the 2013 -14 County budget. It was stated t several Commissioners believe it <br />appropriate for the Board to provide consensus - driven plan guid ce to the County Manager to <br />help in developing his budget. This affords several advant a 'ch ' e the following: <br />1. Avoids confusion and late -stage major adjust in fiscal planning stemming <br />from Commissioner's review of the budget late in rocess, <br />2. Helps determine the will of the Board earlier in the b rocess, <br />3. Helps establish fiscal priorities for the Manager to tak to account during <br />internal budget deliberation,'/ <br />4. Helps "target" areas for incre uction, <br />5. Identifies those areas from the v . (and LCSS Financial Review) <br />that merit inclusion in the Man ' e rop budget, <br />6. Drives Commissioner interactio ° uch ea her in the budget process to <br />identify consensus and the will o' a Board on matters such as tax rate, sales <br />tax distributi method, departme spending levels, capital improvement <br />priorities <br />Discussion of the join zy meretween e City and County were discussed. After discussion, <br />Commissioner Shook mov <br />anager to give the City of Sanford six -month notice of the <br />Boards intent to end the c interlocal agreements on Community Development, Planning and <br />Zoning, Building Inspections, G Collections, Space Rental at the Federal Building, and Animal <br />Control Serv' ective June 30,1 13. Upon a vote, the results were as follows: <br />Aye:'% Irymple, Frazier, Parks, Reives, Shook, Smith, and Womack <br />Nay. ne <br />led the motion had been adopted unanimously. <br />After further di ion of the Budget Planning Guidance and upcoming Capital Improvement Program <br />(CIP), Commis ner Smith moved to approve the FY 2013 -14 Budget Planning Guidance as presented <br />by Commissioner Womack and to suspend the CIP planning process for this year. Upon a vote, the <br />results were as follows: <br />Aye: Dalrymple, Frazier, Parks, Reives, Shook, Smith, and Womack <br />Nay: None <br />The Chairman ruled the motion had been adopted unanimously. <br />