Laserfiche WebLink
Lee County, North Carolina <br /> Finance Department <br /> WHEREAS the Lee County Government, has received and will continue to receive multiple <br /> Federally funded grants, and <br /> WHEREAS the Federal funds are subject to the provisions of the federal Uniform Grant <br /> Guidance, 2 CFR Sect. 200(UG); and <br /> WHEREAS the Uniform Guidance provides, in relevant part: <br /> Allowable Costs/Cost Principles. As outlined in the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR Part <br /> 200, Subpart E regarding Cost Principles, allowable costs are based on the premise that a <br /> recipient is responsible for the effective administration of Federal awards, application of <br /> sound management practices, and administration of Federal funds in a manner consistent <br /> with the program objectives and terms and conditions of the award. Recipients must <br /> implement robust internal controls and effective monitoring to ensure compliance with the <br /> Cost Principles, which are important for building trust and accountability. <br /> Uniform Guidance outline the types of costs that are allowable, including certain audit <br /> costs. For example, per 2 CFR 200.425, a reasonably proportionate share of the costs of <br /> audits required by the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 are allowable;however,costs <br /> for audits that were not performed in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F are not <br /> allowable. Please see 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E regarding the Cost Principles for more <br /> information. <br /> a. Administrative costs: Recipients may use funds for administering the Federal <br /> grant supported program, including costs of consultants to support effective <br /> management and oversight, including consultation for ensuring compliance <br /> with legal, regulatory, and other requirements. Further, costs must be <br /> reasonable and allocable as outlined in 2 CFR 200.404 and 2 CFR 200.405. <br /> Pursuant to the Federal Award Terms and Conditions, recipients may be <br /> permitted to charge both direct and indirect costs to their award as <br /> administrative costs. Direct costs are those that are identified specifically as <br /> costs of implementing the Federally funded program objectives, such as <br /> contract support,materials, and supplies for a project. Indirect costs are general <br /> overhead costs of an organization where a portion of such costs are allocable to <br /> the Federal award such as the cost of facilities or administrative functions like <br /> a director's office. Each category of cost should be treated consistently in like <br /> circumstances as direct or indirect, and recipients may not charge the same <br /> administrative costs to both direct and indirect cost categories, or to other <br /> programs. If a recipient has a current Negotiated Indirect Costs Rate Agreement <br /> (NICRA) established with a Federal cognizant agency responsible for <br /> reviewing, negotiating, and approving cost allocation plans or indirect cost <br /> proposals, then the recipient may use its current NICRA. Alternatively, if the <br /> recipient does not have a NICRA, the recipient may elect to use the de minimis <br /> 2 <br />