My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9-8-21 BOC Regular Meeting
public access
>
Clerk
>
MINUTES
>
2021
>
9-8-21 BOC Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2021 2:15:49 PM
Creation date
10/28/2021 2:15:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Admin-Clerk
Committee
Board of Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
VI.A Introduction to Redistricting Commissioner Districts <br /> Strategic Services Director Don Kovaskcitz provided a presentation for the <br /> commissioners regarding redistricting. The census data was four and a half months <br /> late this year so there is less time than there would normally be to complete the <br /> process. Redistricting is required to be completed and an updated resolution must be <br /> adopted by November 15th and submitted to the State and local Board of Elections. <br /> Redistricting is the process for redrawing the boundaries of the commissioner district <br /> to alleviate the imbalance of population distributions. The first thing to look at is <br /> population. Population must be balanced where the weight of one person must be <br /> somewhat the same in each district. To determine the population distributions you <br /> divide the total population by number of districts for ideal district population and take <br /> that number and subtract it from the current populations in each district and divide it <br /> by the ideal population to get the percent deviation. It needs to be within 5% <br /> deviation in any district. Districts 1 and 3 were found to be well over the 5% deviation <br /> so under this analysis, redistricting is required. Other considerations include looking <br /> at keeping the districts contiguous and compact. Mr. Kovaskcitz stated that the <br /> County is also required to keep incumbents that are elected at large in their districts. <br /> The County used to have to take minorities into account to be in compliance with <br /> Section 5 of the Voters Rights Act, which was declared unconstitutional by the <br /> Supreme Court in 2013, but compliance with Section 2 that prohibits voting practices <br /> that discriminate based upon race is still required. In each map there is a blue line <br /> around the current district as the colors for each district change in placement to <br /> account for redistribution in the population for each district. County Attorney Whitney <br /> Parrish stated that based on prior litigation, tracking race is something we should do <br /> even through it is not a predominant factor. A majority minority area is an area that is <br /> less than 50% non-hispanic white. County Attorney Parrish stated that the County <br /> has also hired a consultant to review the redrawn lines to make sure they comply <br /> with current laws and recommendations. Plan A incorporates part of District 3 into <br /> District 1 to bring the districts into a compliant deviation. Everything is contiguous <br /> and the incumbents are in their districts while still maintaining a majority minority <br /> district. Plan B provides for more compactness and redistributes population between <br /> Districts 1, 2, and 3. Plan B makes Plan A more compact. Plan C changes the district <br /> line along the railroad track to make District 1 more compact. Plan D is the most <br /> compact of the plans so all of District 2 is east of 87 and east of the bypass and east <br /> of 87 in the south and all of District 1 is west of the bypass. It is contiguous, compact <br /> and still maintains a majority minority district for Section 2 compliance. Plan D is <br /> based on population and follows natural and logical boundaries while continuing to <br /> follow Section 2 of the Voters Rights Act. County Attorney Whitney Parrish stated <br /> that there is nothing by statute that requires a public hearing, however she <br /> recommended holding a public hearing to seek input from the public. Commissioner <br /> Reives requested target dates from staff for redistricting. County Manager Dr. John <br /> Crumpton stated that it will be discussed on September 20th and the public hearing <br /> could be held on Monday, October 4th, and then after the public hearing, the board <br /> can vote on which map they prefer and proceed to adopt by resolution on October <br /> 18th. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.