1989 - 12-04-89 Regular Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

3/5. This will cos a basis and $454 for the are underspending thei 100% reimbursement and o~ 13as_ little bit more money, 978 on an annual remainder of this year, but since they r $23,704 allocation; they can file for there will be no cost to the County. Commissioner Matthews moved to approve a full time Social Worker III position and reduce the Social Worker II Intake position to 3/5 time. Commissioner Cox seconded the motion and upon a vote the results were as follows: Aye: Cox, Dossenbach, Matthews, Stafford, and Wicker Nay: None The Board then considered Item #5 of the Agenda. Consideration of an amendment to the contract between Triangle J Council of Governments and the Lee County Department for the Aging. The County Manager reported that when the contract with Triangle J for Federal/State money was signed, House Bill 742 had not been ratified. The attachments on the contract have to be amended after the passage of House Bill 742. The amended attachments will serve as an addendum in the Department for the Aging 89/90 contract with Triangle J. In order for the Agency to receive this additional money it requires the Board to approve the amended contract. Commissioner Matthews moved that the contract between Triangle J Council of Governments and the Lee County Department for the Aging be signed. Commissioner Dossenbach seconded the motion and upon a vote the results were as follows: Aye: Cox, Dossenbach, Matthews, Stafford, and Wicker Nay: None The Chairman ruled the motion carried unanimously. The Board next considered Item #6, Consider a report concerning Park Avenue Park Building Site Conversion. Mr. Don McLaughlin, Parks & Recreation Director, appeared before the Board. He referred to a memo concerning this subject sent to the County Manager on November 15, 1989. He was asked by Mr. Cowan to check into the possibility of seeking an exemption from the Land and Water Conservation Fund for the facility that is currently housed in the Activity Building at Park Avenue Park. Mr. McLaughlin advised that, in his opinion, the attempt to convert would not be successful. The activity has to be ceased to be in compliance with the request of the LWCF rules. His recommendation is not to pursue this, but try to find an alternative to the activity that is currently housed there. Section 6 (f) (3) of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act states that properties acquired or developed with LWCF assistance are prohibited from conversion to other than public outdoor recreation use. Conversions are remedies to otherwise unresolvable situations, not vested rights to the program. Commissioner Dossenbach asked the County Attorney what 4