My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990 - 05-07-90 Regular Meeting
public access
>
Clerk
>
MINUTES
>
1990
>
1990 - 05-07-90 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2009 2:42:38 PM
Creation date
4/15/2009 2:41:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Admin-Clerk
Document Type
Minutes
Committee
Board of Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Board's consideration of a proposal by the Department for the <br />Aging to bid for federal and state money that is available for <br />aging services in Lee County to be administered through the <br />Triangle J COG. The amount of the funds they are bidding on is <br />$198,678. The local match is $19,682. Commissioner Cox asked <br />that since this would be administered through the Triangle J <br />Cog, what happens if this Board votes to not continue membership <br />in Triangle J COG. Mrs. Adams replied they do not know the <br />answer to that yet. They are currently researching <br />alternatives. The County Manager advised that the Aging Program <br />is really a separate identity within the Triangle J Council of <br />Governments, these funds are regionalized. In most cases the <br />largest divisions of CODs are the aging programs. They also <br />receive a grant to administer those programs and then span them <br />on a formula to each one of their member counties. They say <br />the formula they are using favors Lee County in terms of the <br />amount of funds we receive. Mrs. Adams has acknowledged that <br />this is correct. We do receive a proportionate share of those <br />funds based on the formula Triangle J uses. If the County <br />wishes not to be a member of Triangle J, then we would have to <br />negotiate with them for aging funds and the administration of <br />those funds. It could be a separate negotiation from receiving <br />other services. <br />Commissioner Matthews moved to approve the request to bid <br />for Federal/State Funding. Commissioner Stafford seconded the <br />motion and upon a vote the results were as follows: <br />Aye: Cox, Matthews, Stafford and Wicker <br />Nay: None <br />The Chairman recognized Mr. Eugene Hines, Health Director. <br />Mr. Hines advised that at the April 18 meeting of the Board of <br />Health, the Board requested that the Lee County Board of <br />Commissioners recommend to the legislators from this district <br />and to the North Carolina Association of County Commissioners, <br />to request introduction of a Bill requiring restaurant owners to <br />pay for 50% of all required inspections and 100% of all <br />requested re-inspections. Mr. Hines advised that at this time <br />they are not allowed by State law to charge a fee for restaurant <br />inspections. Commissioner Cox moved that the Board of <br />Commissioners accept this recommendation. Commissioner Stafford <br />seconded the motion. The Chairman expressed his concern as to <br />what kind of a fee would be put on this inspection. <br />Commissioner Stafford advised he would like to see a fee based <br />on occupancy. This way the large restaurant and small <br />restaurant are not paying the same thing. Re-inspections are <br />requested by the owner when they receive a grade less than they <br />wanted. That is why the 100% charge for re-inspections. There <br />being no further discussion, upon a vote the results were as <br />follows: <br />Aye: Cox, Matthews, Stafford and Wicker. <br />Nay: None <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.