1991 - 09-16-91 Regular Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

U50R 14 fR,mk We located on the northern side of Hancock Road beginning at a point approximately 630 feet east of the intersection of Hancock Road and South Plank Road from Residential Mixed District to Highway Commercial Conditional Use District, in order to locate a part-time antique telephone and automobile painting business on the property. Speaking in favor of the request, Mr. Jeff Thomas of 8916 Hancock Road stated that he plans to build a 30' x 40' building on the property on which he currently resides, if the property is rezoned. He stated that he talked with his neighbors about his plans and no one objected. There being no others wishing to speak in favor of or in opposition to this request, Mr. Barefoot presented drawings and answered questions on the following request: A petition submitted by Donald T. and Susan Register Oldham for Sanford Grading Company, Inc. to rezone 25.12 acres of land located on the northern side of Lower Moncure Road begining at a point approximately 750 feet east of the intersection of Lower Moncure Road and Eastwood Drive from Residential Restricted and Residential Agricultural District to Heavy Industrial Conditional Use District. The petitioner proposes to locate a mine for soil fill materials on the property. Following some discussion, it was the general concensus of the Board that the Environmental Affairs Board review this request and present their recommendation to the Planning Board prior to the Commissioners' consideration. Mr. Donald Oldham of 1713 Lower Moncure Road stated that he has obtained the proper permits from the State for mining and erosion control for the site. The property is adjacent to his residence. The project would involve a surface removal of soil which would level the area and would not create a pit. The area would then be seeded. Mr. Charles Oldham of 2205 Southern Road reported that Sanford Grading Company, Inc. mined a portion of his property located in Gulf, NC. He was very pleased with the job the company performed and that the property had more aesthetic appeal at the completion of the project than it had originally. After all persons desiring to speak had been given an opportunity to do so, Commissioner Matthews moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Hall seconded the motion, and upon a vote, the results were as follows: Aye: Cox, Hall, Matthews, Paschal, Reives, Stafford, and Wicker Nay: None The chairman declared the motion had been adopted, and the public hearing was closed. Prior to the Planning Board's departure from the meeting, Commissioner Cox moved to authorize the Planning Department to 4