Laserfiche WebLink
0 0 <br />b9V 14 662 <br />The Board recognized Mr. Leonard Barefoot, Planning Director, <br />who had received a request for reconsideration from Mr. William <br />Kottcamp for a rezoning petition. Mr. Kottcamp presented matters <br />which he contended were changes which the Board might consider in <br />evaluating his request for reconsideration. After some discussion <br />commissioner Cox made a motion to deny the request. Having no <br />second, the Chairman declared the motion had died for lack of a <br />second. Commissioner Reives made a motion to send the request back <br />to the Planning Board. Commissioner Hall seconded the motion, and <br />upon a vote, the results were as follows: <br />Aye: Hall, Paschal, Reives, Stafford and Wicker <br />Nay: Cox <br />The Chairman ruled that although the vote was 5 to 1 in favor of <br />the motion that the zoning ordinance requires a unanimous vote to <br />grant a reconsideration and therefore the motion to reconsider fails. <br />Finance Director John A. Crumpton appeared before the Board and <br />advised the Board that bond counsel and representatives of the Local <br />Government Commission had suggested that the County consider <br />refunding the 1986 School Bond issue. The basis for such action is <br />that the County is already planning to issue Courthouse/Jail bonds <br />and Senior Center bonds and adding the expense of a refunding issue <br />is more than offset by the interest rates available today. Mr. <br />Crumpton reported that he had sought proposals from three companies <br />who were willing to serve as financial advisor the the County in the <br />refunding process, and based upon his analysis, it was in the <br />County's best interest to consider refunding the school bond issue. <br />Mr. Crumpton further explained that if the interest rate obtained on <br />the refunding issue was not favorable, then the County was not <br />obligated to go forward with the process and there would be no charge <br />from the financial advisor. After some discussion Commissioner Cox <br />introduced the following bond order which was read at length: <br />"BOND ORDER AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF <br />$9,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS OF <br />THE COUNTY OF LEE" <br />WHEREAS, the County of Lee (the "County") has issued School <br />Bonds, dated August 1, 1986 (the "School Bonds"), and $7,300,000 of <br />the School Bonds are outstanding (the "Outstanding Bonds"); and <br />WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners of the County deems it <br />advisable to refund the Outstanding Bonds pursuant to and in <br />accordance with The Local Government Finance Act; and <br />WHEREAS, an application has been filed with the Secretary <br />of the Local Government Commission of North Carolina requesting <br />Commission approval of the Bonds hereinafter described as required by <br />The Local Government Finance Act, and the Secretary of the Local <br />2 <br />