Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />15 -41rT 451 <br />Aye: Dossenbach, Garner, Matthews, Paschal, Reives and Stafford <br />Nay: None <br />The Chairman ruled the motion had been adopted unanimously. <br />Commissioner Matthews moved to open the public hearing to <br />consider an amendment to the County's 1991 Community Development <br />Block Grant (CDBG) Program. Upon a vote, the results were as <br />follows: <br />Aye: Dossenbach, Garner, Matthews, Paschal, Reives and Stafford <br />Nay: None <br />The Chairman ruled the motion had been adopted unanimously. <br />Ms. Jean Crews-Klein from Skip Green and Associates was present <br />and gave the Board an update on the Community Development Block Grant <br />Project and explained the need for an amendment to the project. <br />No one spoke in favor or opposition to the amendment to the 1991 <br />Community Development Block Grant Program. <br />Commissioner Matthews moved to close the public hearing. Upon a <br />vote, the results were as follows: <br />Aye: Dossenbach, Garner, Matthews, Paschal, Reives and Stafford <br />Nay: None <br />The Chairman ruled the motion had been adopted unanimously. <br />The Board considered an amendment to the 1991 Community <br />Development Block Grant Program. Commissioner Garner moved to <br />approve an amendment to the 1991 Community Development Block Grant <br />Program. Upon a vote, the results were as follows: <br />Aye: Dossenbach, Garner, Matthews, Paschal, Reives and Stafford <br />Nay: None <br />The Chairman ruled the motion had been adopted unanimously. <br />The Board heard a report from Fred Hobbs of Hobbs, Upchurch and <br />Associates on county wide water. After a lengthy discussion <br />commissioner Matthews moved to proceed with the recommendation for <br />Hobbs, Upchurch & Associates to get back together with the County <br />Manager before the next scheduled Board of Commissioners meeting; set <br />up a scope of work; provide a mandate estimate of fees and support of <br />that scope of work and bring to the full Board for consideration a <br />preliminary engineering report authorization. Upon a vote, the <br />results were as follows: <br />02 <br />2 <br />