Laserfiche WebLink
n <br />0 Boos 17 ~r,of 178 0 C ; 3 <br />Aye: Cox, Garner, Mansfield, Matthews, Moretz, Paschal and Reives <br />Nay: None <br />The Chairperson ruled the motion had been adopted unanimously. <br />The Board considered approval to use the Statewide Elections Information <br />Management System in the Board of Elections 017ice. Questions arose as to the <br />cost of the service. After some discussion, Commissioner Reives moved to table <br />the matter until questions concerning the cost could be answered. Commissioner <br />Cox seconded the motion, and upon a vote, the results were as follows: <br />Aye: Cox, Garner, Mansfield, Matthews, Moretz, Paschal and Reives <br />Nay: None <br />The Chairperson ruled the motion had been adopted unanimously. <br />The Board considered a matter concerning the taxation of the Sanford <br />Church of Christ. Chairperson Matthews made the following statement: <br />"In accordance with the notice given at the December 1, 1997 regular <br />meeting, I move to rescind the action at the November 17, 1997 <br />meeting to deny treating the property of the Sanford Church of Christ, <br />identified as PIN 9644-72-1948, as discovered property and I further <br />move that the Board of Commissioners amend the resolution as <br />follows:" <br />That the Board find that the applicant has made a showing <br />of good cause for failure to make a timely application for <br />exemption or exclusion and that the untimely application <br />filed be accepted and approved for the years 1996 and 1997. <br />Commissioner Reives seconded the motion. <br />Commissioner Garner made the following statement: "Members of the <br />Board of Commissioners, persons from the Sanford Church of Christ, others <br />present and those who may see or hear of these proceedings. You are entitled to <br />know why I cannot vote to rescind our action of November 17, 1997 concerning <br />tax liability for the Sanford Church of Christ. <br />Nothing would personally please me more than to do as one church member <br />wrote "it would be a simple matter to acknowledge the tax form was lost and to <br />allow the late filing to be retroactive." However, the facts of this case do not allow <br />me to do that. <br />