My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Package - 01-18-11
public access
>
Clerk
>
AGENDA PACKAGES
>
2011
>
Agenda Package - 01-18-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2011 10:19:03 AM
Creation date
2/17/2011 10:16:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Admin-Clerk
Committee
Board of Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
645 <br />• Maintain TANF Funds to counties – Seek legislation to maintain existing levels of county TANF funding <br />to support and fund county DSS programs. <br />• Explanation: Federal welfare funds, under the TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families) <br />block grant program, can be used for direct cash assistance, wrap around services for eligible <br />families, and to defray administrative costs. The General Assembly has increasingly redirected <br />these funds to offset state social services costs. <br />Maintain childcare subsidy administration – Seek legislation to maintain the Child Care Subsidy <br />Administration funding at 5 percent. <br />• Explanation: Counties currently can use 5 percent of childcare allotments to offset daycare <br />administrative costs. The General Assembly increased this percentage from 4 to 5 percent in <br />both years of the 2009 -10 biennium via a special budget provision. Similar action is needed to <br />maintain the administrative funding at 5 percent. <br />Increase State /County Special Assistance Residency Requirements – Seek legislation to increase the <br />number of days to establish residency for Special Assistance from 90 to 180 days, except for persons <br />who have entered the state to be supported by a close relative. <br />• Explanation: The state /county special assistance program funds adult home care for qualifying <br />seniors. Counties provide 50 percent of the cost of this care and 100 percent of administrative <br />costs. State funds provide the remaining 50 percent of program expenses. There are no federal <br />dollars to offset placement costs, and not all other states provide similar programs. For 2010 -11, <br />county program expenses are estimated at $65 million, with an additional $5.6 million in county <br />administrative expenses. Counties, especially counties that border another state, are concerned <br />that senior citizens without any N.C. ties are relocating to establish residency specifically and <br />only for state /county special assistance eligibility. <br />• Require Back -up Generators for Adult Care Homes – Seek legislation to require all new adult -care <br />homes to have back -up generators prior to receiving certificates of occupancy and require all existing <br />adult -care homes to be equipped with back -up generators within three years. <br />• Explanation: In the event of an emergency and an extended loss of power, county Emergency <br />Medical Services are called upon to move residents from an adult -care home to a shelter or <br />other safe placement. <br />Expedite NCFAST Automation and Policy Simplification – Seek legislation to expedite the <br />implementation of NC FAST and ensure automation builds on program and policy simplification and <br />includes interface protocols. <br />• Explanation: NC FAST (Families Accessing Services through Technology) is currently projected to <br />be fully implemented by 2017. The first modules, Food Stamps and Case Management, are <br />under development. The expedited development and successful implementation of automation <br />efforts should enhance local administration of services applications, improve accurate and <br />efficient eligibility determinations and enhance effective services delivery and management. <br />Retain "Electing" Counties' Financial Incentives – Seek legislation to retain financial incentives for <br />counties to be "electing" counties. <br />• Explanation: North Carolina's implementation of the landmark 1996 federal welfare reform <br />legislation (TANF), known locally as WorkFirst, introduced the notion of "electing counties' — <br />counties who could structure their benefits, services and eligibility requirements to address <br />specific community problems and needs. These "electing counties' are allowed to retain any <br />savings from their normal TANF block grant, but also assume liability should costs exceed federal <br />and state funding. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.