Laserfiche WebLink
LEE COUNTY <br />Committed Today for a Better Tomorrow <br />LEE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS RESOLUTION <br />REQUESTING A LEGAL OPINION FROM THE <br />NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE <br />WHEREAS, G.S.158-7.1 governs when local governments are required to hold public hearings, <br />preceded by public notice, prior to appropriating funds for economic development <br />organizations and programs in its local jurisdiction; and, <br />WHEREAS, G.S.158-7.1 was amended in 2015 clarifying that local governments hold a public <br />hearing, preceded by public notice, before funding incentive grants to entities desiring to locate <br />or expand in its local jurisdiction; and, <br />WHEREAS, some local governments, however, are interpreting this amendment as requiring a <br />local government unit to hold a public hearing, preceded by public notice, prior to funding any <br />economic development organizations, programs or incentive grants in its local jurisdiction; and, <br />WHEREAS, appropriations made to a local economic development organization or program are <br />usually contained in the budget adopted annually by a local government, whereby a public <br />hearing, preceded by public notice, is held by such local government, prior to the approval of <br />such budget; and that requiring another public hearing, preceded by public notice, would be a <br />redundant, inefficient, and repetitious process for such local government; and, <br />WHEREAS, some local governments interpret G.S.158-7.1, as amended, as not requiring local <br />governments to hold another public hearing, preceded by a public notice, of such <br />appropriations for economic development organizations or programs from its current budget, <br />except for incentive grants to an entity to locate or expand in such local government's <br />jurisdiction; and, <br />WHEREAS, such inconsistency in interpretation of G.S.158-7.1, as amended, is causing <br />confusion among local governments and Lee County wishes to seek clarification from the <br />Attorney General's Office regarding this inconsistency and confusion. <br />