My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Package - 10-04-10
public access
>
Clerk
>
AGENDA PACKAGES
>
2010
>
Agenda Package - 10-04-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2011 7:45:59 AM
Creation date
12/13/2010 2:18:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Admin-Clerk
Document Type
Agenda
Committee
Board of Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
607 <br />® The Chairman ruled the motion had been adopted unanimously. <br />The Board considered a Lee County Social Media Policy. Tax Administrator Dwane Brinson <br />presented a draft policy for consideration that will protect the County and establish expectations and <br />set- up for social media usage and aid in the continual development of Lee County's strategic planning <br />process. After discussion, Commissioner Hayes moved to approve the Lee County Social Media <br />Policy, a copy of which is attached to these minutes and by this reference made a part hereof. Upon a <br />vote, the results were as follows: ,rtjjl• <br />Aye: Dalrymple, Hayes, Kelly, Oldham, Paschal, and Shook <br />Nay: Reives ,f <br />The Chairman ruled the motion had been adopted by a six to one vote. <br />The Board considered a revision to the Lee County ' Rd B Yknnel Policy. Humaii'Resource <br />Director Joyce McGehee presented changes to Personnel Policy -1 that are being made to comply <br />tt�t. <br />with changes in the new legislation enacted in Bill 961 wha� expands law regarding release of <br />personnel records. Employees will be provided copies Age updatO policy once approved by the <br />Board of Commissioners. After discussion, Commissioner Old;'amImoved to approve revisions to the <br />Lee County Personnel Policy (Policy B -1) as presented. Upon a T'" the results were as follows: <br />Aye: Dalrymple, Hayes, Kelly, Oldham, Paschal, Reive Shook <br />Nay: None tj { hth,.. <br />® The Chairman ruled the motion had <br />iously. <br />The Board considered a revised Lee C6Nfy'.!Noise Ordinance. Deputy Attorney Dale Talbert <br />presented a revised Ordinance at the request dVommissioner Amy Dalrymple. The purpose of the <br />trU <br />revised Ordinance is to make itr if effective and enforceable. The existing Ordinance contains only a <br />rQ0 it1 <br />subjective standard for deteminingl a sound or noise is illegal. Mr. Talbert stated the amended <br />Ordinance also adds aj — decibel levels crossing property lines — to define <br />violations. The levels(are 41 <br />violations. levels used by other counties employing the standard. <br />The civil penalty and fine{ has ital beeniIincreased in the revised Ordinance. After discussion, <br />Commissioner Reives mov approve the revised Lee County Noise Ordinance. After further <br />discussion, Commissioner Oldham moved to approve the Lee County Noise Ordinance but revise <br />wording in Section 12 -37 — Exception to limitation standards (a) (3) to delete the words "during the day <br />a;tt a t,,. aro <br />time ". Up4n ,gte, the results were as follows: <br />Aye: 'Ill Dalrymple, Hayes, Oldham, Paschal, Reives, and Shook <br />Nay: {Kelly <br />T}i'e_ ChairmaiNI'ruled the motion had been adopted by a six to one vote. Since the Noise <br />Ordinance wasi by a unanimous vote, it must be presented and voted on a second time <br />before final approval. The Noise Ordinance will be placed on the October 4, 2010 agenda for a second <br />vote. <br />The Board considered a Deed of Conveyance for property located on Maple Avenue (the old <br />Whitin Roberts building site). County Manager John Crumpton stated that the Whitin Roberts property <br />® in downtown Sanford (Maple Avenue) was recently foreclosed on for non - payment of taxes. The <br />property has been part of a bankruptcy case for a number of years and recently the City of Sanford was <br />able to foreclose on the property. The City has spent around $90,000 in demolition and Brownfield <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.