Laserfiche WebLink
wun 3 <br />PACE tip' <br />The board considered a resolution for the sale of property on Lower River Road. <br />County Attorney K. R. Hoyle told the board that Lee County acquired the undivided <br />interest of four heirs to a 7-acre tract of land on Lower River Road. The Tax Department <br />calculates the county's interest as being 13% of ownership. Mr. Hoyle stated that Mrs. <br />Callie S. Meadows of Moncure, a member of the Saunders family that originally owned the <br />property, has made an offer to buy the county's 13% interest for $1,500.00 plus the <br />advertising expenses. Tax Administrator Roger Kelley recommends the sale of the <br />property as this offer will proximate the tax value of the county's interest. Mr. Hoyle <br />recommended that the board adopt the resolution to sale the property and begin the upset <br />bid process. Commissioner Paschal moved to approve the resolution authorizing the <br />advertisement of an offer to purchase the county's undivided interest in a lot of land on <br />Lower River Road, Deep River Township, a copy of which is attached to these minutes and <br />by this reference made a part hereof. Upon a vote, the results were as follows: <br />Aye: Adams, Hincks, Lemmond, Matthews, Paschal, Reives, and Sauls <br />Nay: None <br />The Chaimman ruled the motion had been adopted unanimously. <br />The board considered a resolution levying a one-half percent (1/2%) local sales and <br />use tax. County Attorney K. R. Hoyle told the board that the Association of County <br />Commissioners sent a Conn resolution to all counties to consider. After some discussion, <br />Chairman Hincks moved to approve a resolution levying the third one-half cent (1/2¢) local <br />government sales and use tax and prescribing the method of distribution of the proceeds <br />within Lee County effective December 1, 2002. <br />Commissioner Adams made the following statement. "When the economic crisis <br />began, we took prudent steps to protect Lee County's fiscal affairs. We cut spending in <br />sonic areas. We held the line in others. But the demands by the State for spending, and no <br />funds from the State to meet those demands have put us in a bind. And I am profoundly <br />disappointed in several groups close to our State leadership. <br />I. The Association of Commissioners has lobbied for a tax increase in the <br />worst of economics. Instead of drawing a line in the sand with respect to the <br />ridiculous encumbrance of Medicaid they have admitted defeat by accepting <br />the legislature's passing of the buck to counties for their ineptness on <br />spending control. When Ron Aycock, the leader of this illustrious group <br />tells the NRO that this is the first step towards tome Ride I must take <br />offense, passing tax increase is not moving towards Home Rule. Removing <br />mandates is a move towards home Rule. <br />2. The legislature in its quest for an ever-expanding role for government has <br />proven yet again that it cannot and will not control spending. Instead of <br />taking responsibility for their budget by making the difficult cuts, they vote <br />instead to allow the Governor to take the county and city monies so that they <br />can spend it. <br />5 <br />