Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />• Deed of Easement between the County of Lee and the City of <br />Sanford <br />• Interlocal Agreement between the City of Sanford and the Lee <br />County Board of Education <br />Commissioner Adams moved to approve the above documents pertaining to the sewer <br />project for the new high school, copies of which are attached to these minutes and by this <br />reference made a part hereof. Upon a vote, the results were as follows: <br />Aye: Adams, Hincks, Lennmond, Matthews, Paschal, Reivcs, and Stevens <br />Nay: None <br />The Chairman ruled the motion had been adopted unanimously. <br />The Board considered retiree health insurance qualifications. Commissioner <br />Adams moved that the Lee County Retired Employees Health Insurance Policy adopted <br />by the Board of Commissioners on April 15, 1996, he amended to include a new <br />requirement designated as "Number 4" as set out in bold type on the revision of said <br />policy submitted to the Board for its consideration at this meeting and further that the last <br />sentence of the policy be amended to eliminate the period and add "other thcut those <br />gctalifi1ing under the on-the job related disabilitY siltation listed in #4 above" and that <br />this revision be effective with respect to any terminations of employment occurring on or <br />after little 14, 2004, a copy of which is attached to these minutes and by this reference <br />made a part hereof. Upon a vote, the results were as follows: <br />Aye: Adams, Hincks, Lemmond, Matthews, Paschal, Reivcs, and Stevens <br />Nay: None <br />The Chairman ruled the motion had been adopted unanimously. <br />The Board considered a four-year (4) tax revaluation cycle. Tax Administrator <br />Kep Kepley gave a power point presentation and told the Board of Commissioners that <br />currently Lee County is on an eight-year (8) revaluation cycle. Fie told the Board that <br />the county might benefit going to a four-year (4) revaluation tern. Mr. Kepley told the <br />Board that his staff had conducted a random sampling of some three hundred and fifty <br />(350) parcels in order to estimate both the need for a revaluation and the quality of <br />information. It was determined using sales ration study that the average market value is <br />increasing at 9.68% per year. The study showed that the average increase might be higher <br />as market sales seem to be rising. Also, Mr. Kepley stated that the random sampling <br />showed that tax office data needed to be reviewed. Of the three hundred and fifty (350) <br />parcels sampled, Mr. Kepley reported that two hundred (200) had some type of corrective <br />change. According to tax records, the last full list and measure conducted by the tax <br />office was in 1987. Mr. Kepley further told the Board that a project of this size would <br />generate a large amount of revenue for the county. He estimated that changing the tax <br />office data would increase income by $370,280.00 per year when completed or <br />$1,800,000.00 if the county recovers the lost revenue going back five (5) years on each <br />5 <br />