My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2-15-16 Reg. Meeting
public access
>
Clerk
>
MINUTES
>
2016
>
2-15-16 Reg. Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2016 9:31:40 AM
Creation date
3/10/2016 9:30:46 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BK -00028 PG -0106 <br />LEE COUNTY <br />Committed Today for a Better Tomorrow <br />MEMORANDUM <br />Date: February 15, 2016 <br />To: lee County Board of Commissioners <br />From: Kerry A. Self, Lee County Attorney V <br />Re: Legal Obligations Concerning the Provision of Drinking Water to Lee County Citizens <br />At the last regular meeting, this Board asked me to research the legal obligations the County may have <br />concerning the provision of drinking water to county citizens, as well as any options that may be allowed <br />under law to address water quality concerns and to mitigate the threat of contaminated water in private <br />wells and private surface water features. <br />Obligation of Local Governments to Provide Safe Drinking Water <br />Under state law, counties are not legally obligated to provide water or sewer services to citizens. North <br />Carolina General Statutes §153A-283 states, "[i]n no case may a county be held liable for damages for <br />failure to furnish water or sewer services." <br />Case law supports this notion of non -liability. In McNeill v. Harnett, 327 N.C. 552, 398 S.E.2d 475, 1990 <br />N.C. LEXIS 994 (N.C. 1990) (distinguished on other grounds), a case involving the disconnection of <br />citizens from a county -owned water system for failure to pay their water and sewer bill, the North <br />Carolina Supreme Court found that the particular "water service furnished by the County ... does not rise <br />to the level of 'property' protected by due process requirements." The Court further stated, "[w]hile <br />other statutes specifically authorize disconnections in certain situations, N.C.G.S. § 153A-283 states <br />specifically that'[i]n no case may a county be held liable for damages for failure to furnish water or <br />sewer services.' In light of this statutory provision, a citizen of a county in North Carolina may not assert <br />a claim of entitlement to water services." Id. <br />Unlike Harnett County in the above case, Lee County is not in the water business. Thus, no property <br />right has been created, nor can any citizen argue that the County is legally obligated to provide such a <br />service, given the plain language of NCGS § 153A-283. <br />Regulation of Contaminants in Water <br />Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water Act — Public Water vs. Private Water <br />The Environmental Protection Agency's ("EPA") Clean Water Act and the Safe Drinking Water Act are the <br />two federal regulatory bodies of law controlling water quality in the United States. Public water and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.