My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1971 - 04-05-71 Regular Meeting
public access
>
Clerk
>
MINUTES
>
1971
>
1971 - 04-05-71 Regular Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2010 3:11:40 PM
Creation date
3/25/2010 3:11:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Admin-Clerk
Document Type
Minutes
Committee
Board of Commissioners
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HOOK 7 PhG~ 527 <br />BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners <br />of the County of Lee, as follows: <br />(1) The bon&order entitled "Bond Order <br />authorizing the issuance of $500, 000. 00 Sanitary Sewer Bonds <br />of the County of Lee", introduced at the meeting of the Board <br />of Commissioners held on March 1, .1971, is hereby adopted <br />without change or amendment. <br />(2) The bond order entitled "Bond Order <br />authorizing the issuance of $1, 000, 000. 00 Water Bonds of the <br />County of Lee", introduced at the meeting of the Board of <br />Commissioners held on March 1, 1971, is hereby adopted <br />without change or amendment. <br />(3) The Clerk of the Board of Commissioners is <br />hereby directed to cause a copy of such bond orders to be <br />published with the statement as to their adoption prescribed by <br />the County Finance Act in "The Sanford Daily Herald", a news- <br />paper published in Sanford in said County, and such publication <br />shall be made in the manner prescribed by the County Finance <br />Act. <br />The motion having been duly seconded by Commissioner Rogers, <br />it was unanimously adopted. <br />N <br />Representatives of the Greenwood Water System, Inc., appeared <br />before the Board and explained and presented their plans for a proposed system <br />near Lemon Springs in Greenwood Township. After discussion and review of <br />the plans, Commissioner Rogers moved that the construction of the proposed <br />system be approved and the Clerk be authorized to forward a letter on behalf <br />of the Board signifying its approval. Commissioner White seconded the motion <br />and upon a vote it was unanimously adopted. <br />Mr. Hugh Brewer, Superintendent of Buildings and Grounds, <br />appeared before the. Board and presented figures with respect to repair of the <br />Courthouse Annex. Upon motion of Commissioner White, seconded by Commissioner <br />Gordon Wicker, it was RESOLVED to appropriate the sum of $800. 00 from the <br />Emergency and Contingency Fund to the Courthouse Annex Fund for the purpose <br />of maintaining the building and making repairs. Messrs. White, Rogers, Gordon <br />Wicker and Franklin D. Wicker all voted for the motion upon a roll call vote and <br />no one voted against it. <br />The Chairman then announced that the Board would hear both pro- <br />ponents and opponents of regulation of motor fuel dispensing devices and allowed <br />Mr. Donald Smith, an attorney from Raleigh, North Carolina, representing Marshall <br />Oil Company, to begin the discussion. Following Mr. Smith's presentation, <br />Mr. J. O. Bridges, Mr. Lynn Perry, Mr.. Shelton Wicker, and Mr. Jesse C. <br />Thomas, all spoke on the proposition. When all interested parties had been heard, <br />the Chairman thanked the persons present for their interest and participation and <br />announced that the Board would take action upon the proposition during this meeting <br />and that due notice would be given of whatever action was taken. <br />Upon motion of Commissioner Rogers, seconded by Commissioner <br />Gordon Wicker, it was RESOLVED to pay the monthly bills and submitted by the <br />County Accountant and supported by purchase orders. <br />The Chairman called up for discussion, the question of the <br />establishment of a Housing Authority for the County, but upon motion made, <br />seconded and adopted by a majority vote, it was resolved to postpone consideration <br />of this matter for two weeks or until the next meeting of the Board. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.