Laserfiche WebLink
BK - 00027 PG <br />• Agreement and Bill of Sale to the City of Sanford for the Colon Road Lift Station <br />(copy attached). <br />Upon a vote, the results were as follows: <br />Aye: Dalrymple, Frazier, Knecht, Oldham, Reives, and Sloan <br />Nay: None <br />Absent: Smith <br />The Chair ruled the motion had been adopted unanimously. <br />Pursuant to N.C. General Statute §153A -52.1, the Chair opened the floor for Public Comments. <br />The following signed up to speak and were allowed 3 minutes for comments; <br />1. Rev. Bruce Maclnnes, 1611 Carbontor <br />Family Medical Leave) <br />2. Ed Underwood, 3309 Westcott Circle, <br />Medical Leave) <br />Road, Sanford (Personnel Policy change for <br />Sanford (Personnel Policy change for Family <br />The Board considered a Subdivision Street Maintenance Policy that had been presented and <br />discussed at the March 16th meeting. Staff were instructed to provide a policy for the Board to <br />consider. County Manager John Crumpton stated that General Statute 153A -205 authorizes counties to <br />levy special assessments to finance road improvements to subdivision and residential streets in order <br />to bring those streets up to NCDOT standards so they may become part of the State - maintained <br />system. Staff drafted a policy that would allow property owners to petition the Board of Commissioners <br />to use this special assessment authority. The policy is restricted to streets that were publicly dedicated, <br />but have not yet been accepted by NCDOT for maintenance. It would not cover privately dedicated <br />streets. The policy lists other factors the Board may consider in its evaluation of petitions for special <br />assessments. It was noted a Policy must be approved and in place before further steps can be taken <br />to assist the residents. Commissioner Reives stated he would like to hear from the citizens present on <br />the matter. The following spoke in reference to the Subdivision Street Maintenance Policy and /or <br />issues surrounding the development: <br />1. Bob Bridwell, former Community Development Director who worked on the issue for <br />4 years prior to his retirement in 2014, <br />2. Susan Frost, 639 Buckroe Drive — resident — single mother that can't afford <br />assessment if one is put in place, disappointed the contractor did not complete the <br />road as promised, original contractor should be held responsible, why did County not <br />step in to make sure contractor fulfilled his obligation. <br />3. Rebecca Little, 123 Buckroe Drive — resident — not in a position to give money for the <br />road project at this time, feels the County let the residents down, doesn't feel there is <br />75% of the residents willing to undertake this project, doesn't want to keep coming to <br />Commissioner meetings to discuss the matter. <br />4. Joyce Buzinski, 460 Buckroe Drive — resident — all lots are sold except one at this <br />time. A few years ago 85% of the residents signed a petition to have the road <br />repaired. Price will continue to go up the longer it takes to get something resolved. <br />5. Robert Buzinski, 460 Buckroe Drive — resident — price keeps going up, need to have <br />an engineering study completed first, would like to see the community come together <br />to get the issue resolved. <br />2 <br />