Agenda - 4-20-15 Reg. Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

003 • Agreement and Bill of Sale to the City of Sanford for the Colon Road Lift Station (copy attached). Upon a vote, the results were as follows: Aye: Dalrymple, Frazier, Knecht, Oldham, Reives, and Sloan Nay: None Absent: Smith The Chair ruled the motion had been adopted unanimously. Pursuant to N.C. General Statute §153A -52.1, the Chair opened theoor fo omments. r is C The following signed up to speak and were allowed 3 minutes for comments; 0 1. Rev. Bruce Maclnnes, 1611 Carbonton Road, d (Personnel Polipf change for Family Medical Leave) 2. Ed Underwood, 3309 Westcott Circle, Sa (P711-11n ` el Policy change for Family Medical Leave) � /O2 The Board considered a Subdivision Street Maintenance P that had been presented and discussed at the March 16th meeting. Staff were instructed to pr a policy for the Board to consider. County Manager John Crumpton stated that General Statute 1 A -205 authorizes counties to levy special assessments to finance road imp ents to subdivision and residential streets in order to bring those streets up to NCDOT standar may become part of the State - maintained system. Staff drafted a policy that would allow e petition the Board of Commissioners to use this special assessment authority. The po . estri , to streets that were publicly dedicated, but have not yet been accepted by NCDOT for intenance. It would not cover privately dedicated streets. The policy lists other factors the Board m consider in its evaluation of petitions for special assessments. It was noted a cy must be appro and in place before further steps can be taken to assist the residents. Co er Reives state he would like to hear from the citizens present on the matter. The followi spok reference to the Subdivision Street Maintenance Policy and /or issues surrounding th pm, 1. Bob Bridw" rmer Community Development Director who worked on the issue for 4 years prior irement in 2014, usan Frost, r eis uckroe Drive — resident — single mother that can't afford ssment if put in place, disappointed the contractor did not complete the r s promised, original contractor should be held responsible, why did County not ste to make sure contractor fulfilled his obligation. 3. Re ca Little, 123 Buckroe Drive — resident — not in a position to give money for the roa project at this time, feels the County let the residents down, doesn't feel there is 7 6 of the residents willing to undertake this project, doesn't want to keep coming to ommissioner meetings to discuss the matter. Joyce Buzinski, 460 Buckroe Drive — resident — all lots are sold except one at this time. A few years ago 85% of the residents signed a petition to have the road repaired. Price will continue to go up the longer it takes to get something resolved. 5. Robert Buzinski, 460 Buckroe Drive — resident — price keeps going up, need to have an engineering study completed first, would like to see the community come together to get the issue resolved. 2